Rourke v. Rothman
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKafker, J.
In this case, we address the interplay of grandfather clauses in local zoning by-laws and the grandfather provision of the Zoning Act, G. L. c. 40A, § 6, fourth par., as appearing in St. 1975, c. 808, § 3, and as amended by St. 1979, c. 106.2 More precisely, we determine whether, because of c. 40A, § 6, *600a lot that was once buildable due to a local by-law exemption from minimum lot size requirements remains buildable, even after the repeal of that local grandfather exemption. We conclude that c. 40A, § 6, protects the right to build on lots that conformed to existing dimensional requirements…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Adamowicz v. Town of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Davis v. Zoning Board of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Tsagronis v. Board of Appeals of WarehamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Inspector of Buildings of Burlington v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- DeGrace v. Conservation Commission of HarwichMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rourke v. RothmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Choate v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Berg v. Town of LexingtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Shaw River, Inc. v. PearsonMassachusetts Superior Court · 2011