Legal Opinion

Reider v. Schmidt

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2000No. NonePublished

1Dissent 1

[¶ 34.]

2Dissent · GilbertsonGilbertson, Justice

[¶ 35.] Father argues the trial court abused its discretion in modifying his visitation schedule as punishment for his failure to comply with previous visitation orders. I agree.

[¶ 36.] “A trial court is given broad discretion when considering matters of visitation.” Hybertson v. Hybertson, 1998 SD 83, ¶ 14, 582 N.W.2d 402, 405. Accord Weber v. Weber, 529 N.W.2d 190, 191 (S.D.1995). “ ‘However, the trial court’s exercise of discretion is not uncontrolled and must have a sound and substantial basis in the testimony.’ ” Weber, 529 N.W.2d at 191 (quoting Williams v. Williams, 425 N.W.2d…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. E.H. v. M.H.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Weber v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Steffen v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Hybertson v. HybertsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API