Legal Opinion

Young v. Multnomah County Sheriff Dan Noelle

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 6, 2002No. 0010-10901; A113123PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

The Sheriff of Multnomah County revoked petitioner’s concealed handgun license (CHL). She petitioned for review in the circuit court, but the court dismissed her petition because it was not timely filed within the 30-day limit established by ORS 166.293(5). Petitioner appeals. The dis-positive issue is whether the 30-day period began to run when the sheriff sent petitioner notice of the revocation, as the sheriff contends and the trial court concluded, or when she actually received it, as petitioner contends. We agree with petitioner and reverse.

The following facts come from the parties’…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. DeMelloOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DIBBERNOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. RODRIGUEZ-BARRERAOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. WellsOregon Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API