Legal Opinion

State v. Herring

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 11, 1992No. 91-60038; CA A69526PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He assigns error to the court’s order admitting the result of an Intoxilyzer test. We affirm.

After defendant was arrested for driving under the influence of intoxicants, officers Slater and Barrett transported him to the Springfield Police Department, where there was an Intoxilyzer. Before Slater administered the breath test, he observed defendant for a total of 12 minutes. He left for 3 minutes, and during that time Barrett observed defendant. When Slater returned, he asked Barrett if defendant had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. McVayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BaldersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. TynonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State v. BaldersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. TynonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. TynonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API