Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Irwin

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1933No. 1435—6078PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHORT, Presiding Judge.

The following introductory statement of this case is made by the plaintiffs in error in their application for the writ of error: “This is an action brought in the trial court by the plaintiffs in error Y. B. Rogers and W. Earl Harrison, doing business as the Auto Finance Company against E. M. Rabón to recover the balance due on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage on a Ford car given to secure same. The- car was sequestrated by the plaintiffs in error whereupon the defendant filed a -replevy bond with D. B. Irwin and H. H. Tompkins as sureties. The trial court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Overstreet v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Watts v. OverstreetTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brunson v. Dawson State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Carter v. WallaceTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  5. Southern Surety Co. v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shapiro v. Sampson Bros. & Cooper, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API