Legal Opinion
In re Miller
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 12, 1904No. 1,691PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Bankruptcy. On motion to dismiss specifications of objection to discharge.
1Opinion of the Court
J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.
The specifications of objection to the bankrupt’s discharge are as follows:
“1. The said Hiram A. Miller did not appear at the first meeting of his creditors, or at any other meeting, to be examined publicly by his said creditors, trustee, and referee.
“2. The evidence shows that the said Hiram A. Miller has not been mentally capable of undergoing an examination by any of his creditors since his adjudication as a bankrupt.
“3. His creditors should first he given an opportunity to examine him before he is discharged.
“4. The evidence shows that the said Hiram A.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re HicksDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1901
- In re BurkaDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1901
- In re RisteenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re MurrayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1996
- In re AgnewDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1915
- In Re MyersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006
- In Re BergeronUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1999