Legal Opinion

In Re Bergeron

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California

Decided July 7, 1999No. 19-04008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER EXCUSING DEBTOR’S APPEARANCE AT SECTION 341 MEETING, VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, AND DIRECTING THAT DISCHARGE ENTER

RANDALL J. NEWSOME, Bankruptcy Judge.

This chapter 7 case is before the court pursuant to debtor Melvin Bergeron’s motion to enter a discharge. The motion is opposed by the United States trustee on the grounds that Mr. Bergeron has failed to appear at the meeting of creditors mandated by 11 U.S.C. § 341. 1 The issue squarely presented is whether the debtor’s appearance at a § 341 meeting can be excused by the bankruptcy court, notwithstanding the unqualified directive of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. In Re Pacific Atlantic Trading Co., Debtor. United States of America, Claimant-Appellant v. Robert F. Towers, Trustee-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. ConawayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re ZawiszaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re HensonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 2003
  2. In Re MaaliDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
  3. Christopher Michael Schultz and Alyssa SchultzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API