Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Gould

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1916No. 18480PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the district court for Douglas county: Abraham L. Sutton, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrissey, O. J.

Action for personal injuries received by plaintiff while in defendant’s employ as the operator of a concrete mortar mixing machine. Defendant was a building contractor engaged in erecting a concrete structure. It is alleged that, while plaintiff was performing his duties as a mortar mixer, the defendant, “by and through its foreman and employees, carelessly and negligently permitted a heavy plank * * * to fall from the platform or cage of a steam hoist used by the defendant in the construction of said building, from a height of about 100 feet, and strike plaintiff upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Union Pacific Railroad v. EricksonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Norfolk Beet-Sugar Co. v. KochNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Bennett v. Chicago City Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brayman v. Russell & Pugh Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State v. BestNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Asbury v. Hecla Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API