Legal Opinion
House v. Moomaw
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 20, 1964No. 2816PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSherer, J.
This is an appeal from an order of the Common Pleas Court of Montgomery County, Ohio, overruling the application of plaintiff, appellant herein, seeking leave of court to file a supplemental petition as provided in Section 2309.63, Revised Code, as follows:
“On such terms as to costs as the court prescribes, either party may file a supplemental petition, answer, or reply, alleging facts material to the case which occurred since the filing of the former petition, answer, or reply. Reasonable notice of the application therefor must be given, when the court so requires. ’ ’
The parties will…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Andrianos v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
- Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
- Forest City Investment Co. v. HaasOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Wheeler v. HansonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Kaiser v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1940
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. EberhardtOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Nazem v. MaslowskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
- Shull v. Simpson, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1967