Brown v. State

SUBSTITUTED OPINION FOLLOWING MOTION FOR REHEARING

KOEHLER, Justice.

Edward Brown, Appellant, has filed a motion for rehearing, requesting that we address all seven of his points of error rather than just the three points covered in our original opinion. We have concluded that his request has merit. Accordingly, although we are denying his motion for rehearing, we withdraw our prior opinion of May 5, 1994 and substitute the following in its place. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.

Edward Brown appeals from a conviction for the offense of indecency with a child. Upon a finding of…