Riley v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKMAN, Associate Judge.
Ricardo Riley was convicted of armed robbery based on evidence that he drove the getaway car for Thomas Bell after Bell held up a Payless Shoe Store at gunpoint. On appeal, Riley seeks a new trial because the trial court permitted the government to introduce other crimes evidence on the issue of Riley’s intent to aid and abet Bell in the commission of the robbery. This evidence consisted of testimony that a month before Riley was arrested in this case, the police stopped him while he was driving the getaway car for Bell following the armed robbery of another retail…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Nelson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Busey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Anderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- Muschette v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Anderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004