Legal Opinion

Minneapolis Harvester Works Co. v. Cummings

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Smith District Court. Action brought by the Minneapolis Harvester Worhs Co. against Cummings, to recover for certain notes placed in the hands of defendant for collection. Trial at the October Term, 1880, of the district court, and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

The plaintiff in error sought to recover from defendant in error, judgment for $211.66 for notes placed in the hands of the defendant for collection. The defendant, in answer, pleaded a set-off of several items as follows:

“Cash paid for freight upon two machines, $30j commis*368sion on' two machines returned on account of defects, $74; cash paid for livery hire, $38.70; damages on account of the sale of machines by other parties in the territory of defendant, with the knowledge and consent of plaintiff, $370; damages to defendant’s business,…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Artwein v. LinkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Dodson v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Severy v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  5. Dody v. State Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API