Free Gold Mining Co. v. Spiers
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County directing a receiver to purchase property and striking out and disregarding appellant’s opposition thereto. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Bicknell, Gibson & Trask, J. S. Chapman, and Goodrich & McCutchen, for Intervener, Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
At the commencement of the present action a receiver was appointed to take possession of, and, under the direction of the court, to manage the property described in the complaint. The receiver afterward applied to the court for an order directing him to purchase and install a cyanide plant upon the property. Prior thereto, apparently in anticipation of such application, the appellant herein, who is not named as a party to the action, having obtained from the court an ex parte order therefor, filed a petition, styled by him a complaint in intervention, against permitting the receiver to incur…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Free Gold Mining Co. v. SpiersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elliott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Weygandt v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Pacific Coast Coal Co. v. EsaryWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Estate of Hanley v. HanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943