Legal Opinion

Martensen v. Arnold

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 5, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Action in Tort.—Trial in the Circuit Court of McLean County; the Hon. Colostin D. Myers, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Appeal by plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Glenn

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action in tort. The declaration contains three counts—two in case and one in trespass. The jury,found appellee not guilty, and the court rendered a judgment in his favor, for his costs upon the court overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial, and he brings the case to this court by appeal.

The appellant claims the following is an epitome of the facts: That he had.a sick child, and was permitted to go to his neighbor Moberry’s cistern to get water for;it, and while entering the premises on the 13th . day of January,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coal Co. v. HaenniIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Moshier v. Kitchell & ArnoldIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Panton v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. City of Chicago v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farmers' Bank v. GarrowNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. MeeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  3. Slater v. PomeroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API