Legal Opinion

Lanier v. Berry

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 25, 1930No. 19658PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) By the act of 1838 it was provided that “whenever it shall be shown by words expressed in the body or conclusion of said written contract or other instrument in writing, that it was the intention of the party or parties subscribing the same, to become bound by, or to execute a writing, obligato^, or sealed instrument, though no scroll or seal has been annexed to said written contract or other instrument,” it should be considered an instrument under seal. It was further provided by that act that any such instrument having “a scroll or other representation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ridley v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Baldwin Fertilizer Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Milledge v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  4. Latham v. KolbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  5. National Surety Co. v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hamby v. CrispCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Marshall v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. McCalla v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Chastain v. L. Moss Music Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
  5. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company, Inc. v. Pattillo Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API