Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Campos

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1996No. 21429Published

1Dissent

FRANCHINI, Justice (dissenting).

51. I respectfully dissent. This was not a jury trial. The trial court, in its role as the factfinder, specifically stated that it had a reasonable doubt that Campos intended to kill Gutierrez and that it also had a reasonable doubt that, at the time the acts were committed, Campos knew that his acts created a strong probability of death or great bodily harm. See NMSA 1978, § 30-2-l(B) (setting forth elements of felony murder and second-degree murder). The State did not challenge the trial court’s finding of reasonable doubt, and that finding is binding on this…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Terry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WilsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Santillanes v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. BittingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API