Millman v. United Technologies Corporation
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION OPAL MILLMAN, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Cause No. 1:16-CV-312-HAB ) RTX CORPORATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER In February, the Court ordered the parties to brief Article III standing for each of Plaintiffs’ claims. (ECF No. 457). That briefing is now complete. (ECF Nos. 463, 466-69). Defendants RTX Corp., Lear Corp. EEDS and Interiors, and CP Products, LLC (“RTX”) concede that Plaintiff Opal Millman has standing to pursue her claims for state-law trespass and nuisance, but standing for all…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- TransUnion LLC v. RamirezSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.