Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Sondok

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 2, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

In an action by plaintiff Dorothy Weiss to recover damages for personal injuries and by her husband for medical expenses and loss of services, order denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave to plaintiffs to plead over, if so advised, within ten days after the entry of the order hereon. The complaint should state the facts upon which plaintiffs rely for their cause of action. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 241; Schweitzer v. Mmdlin, 248 N. Y. 560; Pagnillo…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pagnillo v. Mack Paving & Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. Schweitzer v. MindlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Beatty v. McCutcheonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API