Legal Opinion

Schweitzer v. Mindlin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1928PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order of Appellate Division and that of Special Term reversed and defendant’s motion for judgment granted, with costs in all courts. Question certified answered in the negative. Held, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that it fails to state any facts from which an inference of negligence is possible.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrew's, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Heisler v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Foley v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
  4. Patterson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Pritzker v. FalkNew York Supreme Court · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API