Legal Opinion
Fournier v. Holyoke Street Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 7, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
These are two actions of tort. In one Mary Fournier seeks to recover damages for alleged personal injuries sustained by her on December 20, 1918, at about five o’clock in the evening, when, as is alleged, she was attempting to board a street car of the defendant; in the other action her husband, John L. Fournier, seeks to recover for expenses incurred by him and alleged to have been necessitated by the same injury for which Mary Fournier sues. There was no question of pleading raised at the trial. At the close of the evidence, the defendant filed a motion requesting the trial judge to direct…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rocci v. Massachusetts Accident Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- O'Donnell v. Inhabitants of ClintonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Webster v. Fitchburg RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Gordon v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Duchemin v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Boston Five Cents Savings Bank v. BrooksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Head v. MortonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Barrett v. ConraganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Shaw v. Victoria Coach Line, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.