Legal Opinion

Logan City v. Utah Power & Light Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1932No. 5135PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElias Hansen, J.

In the court below defendant demurred to plaintiff’s complaint upon four grounds, viz.: (1) That the complaint shows on its face that all of the matters relied upon by the plaintiff for its cause of action have been determined .and adjudicated in two former suits; (2) that the complaint shows on its face that there is a defect of parties defendant in that plaintiff seeks to re-examine matters in which the rights of numerous other parties are involved; (3) that the complaint fails to state sufficient facts to constitute a cause of action; and (4) that several causes of action have been…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Pearce v. OlneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
  3. Kent v. RicardsHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1850
  4. Logan, Hyde Park & Smithfield Canal Co. v. Logan CityUtah Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. East Mill Creek Water Co. v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In Re Rice's Estate. Rice v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Rice v. RiceUtah Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Todaro v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Logan City v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API