Legal Opinion

Logan, Hyde Park & Smithfield Canal Co. v. Logan City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1928No. 4556PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.

This is an appeal by Logan City, etc., from a decree confirming the several titles of the plaintiffs and the cross-defendant, Utah Power & Light Company, to the use of certain waters of Logan river, in Cache county, and enjoining the defendants Logan City and its officers from interfering with or disturbing the exercise of such rights by fluctuating or causing a variation in the natural flow of the water of the river.

The plaintiffs and the cross-defendant, whose claims and interests herein are similar, are severally the owners of extensive rights to the use of the waters of Logan river for…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Martinez v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Utah Power & Light Co. v. Richmond Irr. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932
  3. In Re Bear River Drainage AreaUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Whitcomb v. MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Logan City v. Utah Power & Light Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API