Rice v. Tuscaloosa County
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
PER -CURIAM.
Upon consideration of this cause in consultation, the Court concludes that the judgment of the court below is due to be affirmed, both upon application of our non-claim statute, Code 1923, § 228, and upon the principle of law applicable to voluntary payments. The Court deems unnecessary a discussion of these questions further than to state disagreement with the theories set forth in the dissenting opinion, which take this case from without the influence of said- non-claim statute and the principle applicable to voluntary payment of money.
The judgment is accordingly here affirmed.
Af…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Rice v. Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Adams v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Deal v. Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950