Legal Opinion

Rice v. Tuscaloosa County

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 25, 1940No. 6 Div. 602PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PER -CURIAM.

Upon consideration of this cause in consultation, the Court concludes that the judgment of the court below is due to be affirmed, both upon application of our non-claim statute, Code 1923, § 228, and upon the principle of law applicable to voluntary payments. The Court deems unnecessary a discussion of these questions further than to state disagreement with the theories set forth in the dissenting opinion, which take this case from without the influence of said- non-claim statute and the principle applicable to voluntary payment of money.

The judgment is accordingly here affirmed.

Af…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rice v. Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  2. Adams v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  3. Deal v. Tuscaloosa CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API