Legal Opinion

Hyde Construction Co. v. Koehring Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1972No. 71-1759PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Circuit Judge:

This is an interlocutory appeal and cross-appeal allowed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292(b) to settle a discovery problem which lies at the heart of a pending controversy. It is indeed that rare case where the issue presented in the context of discovery and a foreordained trial of *339unusual length, involves a controlling question of law and where an immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.1

Two suits are involved, both removed from a Mississippi state court. The defendant in each is Koehring Company. The plaintiff in one suit is Hyde…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  3. Garner v. WolfinbargerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Hunt v. BlackburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. Larry Dickinson and Gibbs AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. United States v. Arturo Reyes Mendoza, June Bunch Mendoza, and Oscar Reyes MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Vardaman S. Dunn v. Koehring Company, Hyde Construction Company, Inc., Cross v. Koehring Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Valente v. Pepsico, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  5. Somer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API