Legal Opinion
Wood v. General Teamsters Union, Local 406
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided April 12, 1984No. G80-742 CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENJAMIN F. GIBSON, District Judge.
This action arose out of a labor dispute surrounding the sale of warehouse facilities by Kroger to Hamady. The plaintiffs, former Kroger employees who were not hired by Hamady after the sale, brought the action alleging, inter alia, that the union breached its duty of fair representation to the plaintiffs in not protecting their
seniority and other rights under the collective bargaining agreement with Kroger and that Kroger breached the collective bargaining agreement. 1
During the course of the labor dispute, five grievances were filed against Kroger…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Andros Compania Maritima, S.A., as Disponent Owners of the Kissavos, and Marc Rich & Co., A.G., as CharterersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Fayerweather v. RitchSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fleming v. UPSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Arcuri v. Trump Taj Mahal AssociatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- Local P-9, United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO v. George A. Hormel & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- Tingley v. 900 Monroe, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Local P-9 v. George A. Hormel & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.