Legal Opinion
Langdon v. Saltser & Weinsier, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 24, 1959No. Civ. No. 12743PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
Because of the disposition prior to trial of all other claims, the suit in its present posture now embraces only a demand for damages for the alleged infringement of claim 2 of reissue patent No. 21,323 issued to the plaintiff Jesse D. Langdon on January 16, 1940. The original patent was granted on March 23, 1937, and, therefore, the reissue patent expired while this action was pending. The plaintiff Eureka Vacuum Breaker Corporation is the assignee of the reissue patent. The defendant Saltser & Weinsier, Inc. was allegedly a customer of the intervener-defendant Sloan…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jesse D. Langdon and Eureka Vacuum Breaker Corporation v. Saltser & Weinsier, Inc., Sloan Valve Company, Intervener-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961