Legal Opinion

Mola v. Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1935No. 25404. Department TwoPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was instituted by appellant as administratrix against respondent, a municipal corporation, for damages for the death of appellant’s decedent, her husband.

There is little dispute in the facts in the case. At the conclusion of the testimony offered on behalf of appellant, the lower court granted the motion of respondent for a nonsuit, and judgment was entered thereon,- from which this appeal results.

Eespondent is an organized metropolitan park district, established and created by virtue of Rem. Rev. Stat., §§6720 to 6741 [P. C. §§1150 to 1171], inclusive.

Under the statutes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Nelson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hughes v. McVayWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Stuver v. City of AuburnWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. City of Seattle v. Lloyds' Plate Glass Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Kilbourn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Wash. State Major League Baseball Stadium Pfd v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Const. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Washington State Major League Baseball Stadium Public Facilities District v. Huber, Hunt & Nichols-Kiewit Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API