Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Bentley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 25, 1985Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEllerin, J.

in a memorandum as follows: I concur in the majority’s dismissal of the count of the indictment charging defendant with criminal possession of a controlled substance but would also reverse and remand for a new trial on the attempted murder charge by reason of the prejudicial nature of the prosecutor’s summation, which deprived defendant of a fair trial.

In summation, the Assistant District Attorney, in marshaling the evidence, made the following statements:

"And then he [defendant] realized how stupid and he runs upstairs and that’s when the thinking starts setting in. Remember the testimony…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. ChristmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API