People v. Bentley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEllerin, J.
in a memorandum as follows: I concur in the majority’s dismissal of the count of the indictment charging defendant with criminal possession of a controlled substance but would also reverse and remand for a new trial on the attempted murder charge by reason of the prejudicial nature of the prosecutor’s summation, which deprived defendant of a fair trial.
In summation, the Assistant District Attorney, in marshaling the evidence, made the following statements:
"And then he [defendant] realized how stupid and he runs upstairs and that’s when the thinking starts setting in. Remember the testimony…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. SettlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. ChristmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.