Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 17, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Commissioner.

The factual situation presented in this appeal is a nove one involving various rights under a fire insurance policy. In substance, the judgment of the trial court was adverse to the appellant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and by this appeal that company seeks a reversal of the judgment. A statement of the underlying facts is necessary to clarify the questions presented here.

Jewell Moore and Ohoma Moore, his wife, jointly owned a residence at Mortons Gap. On July 13, 1963, a fire insurance policy in the amount of $3,000 was issued by the appellant company, covering fire…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burlew v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Cox v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
  3. Dunning v. Continental Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Salyersville National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. Hornback v. HornbackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
  3. Danielson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API