Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Moore
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Commissioner.
The factual situation presented in this appeal is a nove one involving various rights under a fire insurance policy. In substance, the judgment of the trial court was adverse to the appellant, Hartford Fire Insurance Company, and by this appeal that company seeks a reversal of the judgment. A statement of the underlying facts is necessary to clarify the questions presented here.
Jewell Moore and Ohoma Moore, his wife, jointly owned a residence at Mortons Gap. On July 13, 1963, a fire insurance policy in the amount of $3,000 was issued by the appellant company, covering fire…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burlew v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Cox v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953
- Dunning v. Continental Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965
3Cited by3 opinions
- Salyersville National Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Hornback v. HornbackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
- Danielson v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969