Legal Opinion
Mid-South Cogeneration, Inc. v. Tennessee Valley Authority
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided March 18, 1996No. 3:94-cv-00283PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
JORDAN, District Judge.
This civil action came on for trial without a jury beginning on Tuesday, December 4, 1995. At the time of trial, the court had under advisement the defendant’s motion for summary judgment [doc. 12]. The court has considered the evidentiary material filed in support of and in opposition to this motion for summary judgment together with the evidence adduced at trial. The following are the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law rendered under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).
The plaintiff states three theories of recovery in its complaint.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- H.F. Allen Orchards, Elbert B. Schinmann, R.E. Redman & Sons, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- H. Landau & Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Mack Sanders, Jane Forbes, Trustee v. First National Bank & Trust Company in Great BendCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Smith Cogeneration Management, Inc. v. Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Daly Construction, Inc. v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Power Resource Group, Inc. v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005