Legal Opinion

People v. Bell

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 25, 1983No. 81-929, 81-931, 81-953, 81-1110 consPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Defendants Darryl Bell, Kevin Mitchell, William Martin, and Vincent Bevley were convicted, after trial by jury, of murder (one count each), attempted murder (five counts each), and armed violence based on attempted murder (five counts each). (See 111. Rev. Stat. 1979, ch. 38, pars. 9 — 1(a), 8 — 4(a), and 33A — 2.) No issue is raised on the sentences imposed by the trial court, but the defendants assert that their convictions should be reversed for the following reasons:

1. The evidence is not sufficient to prove that (a) Mitchell and Bell intended to kill the attempted-murder complainants, or…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. CarlsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. The People v. WeinsteinIllinois Supreme Court · 1966

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. BarrowIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. StarksAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  3. People v. SpeightIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. People v. MedranoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API