Legal Opinion

Roy v. Thomas Eloise F. Thomas v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 26, 2000No. 99-3532PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs 1 , Roy V. Thomas and Eloise F. Thomas, appeal the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment in favor of the defendant, United States of America, in this tax refund action. Plaintiffs raise one issue on this appeal: (1) whether the district court erred in determining that the plaintiffs’ lottery income did not fall within the economic benefit doctrine under 26 U.S.C. § 61. We believe that the district court was correct in finding that this doctrine did not apply; thus, we affirm the decision of the district court.

I. Facts

On December 11, 1992,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Commissioner v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Tucker v. AlexanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Sproull v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Cinemark Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Anna S. Petrey, D/B/A Magnum Towing v. City of ToledoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  3. Campbell v. Hamilton County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  4. Spengler v. ADT Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Womack v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API