Legal Opinion
Mumma v. Mumma
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 9, 1999No. 98-2419, 98-2452PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
734 So.2d 571 (1999)
Barbara McK. MUMMA and Lisa Mumma Morgan, as Co-Executrixes of the Estate of Robert M. Mumma, Appellants/Cross-Appellees,
v.
Robert MUMMA, II, and Hi-Spec, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees/Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 98-2419, 98-2452.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
June 9, 1999.
Rehearing Denied July 9, 1999.
James L.S. Bowdish of Crary, Buchanan, Bowdish, Bovie, Roby, Beres, Negron & Thomas, Chartered, and Jordan Fields of Fields & Wilkinson, P.A., Stuart, for appellants/cross-appellees.
Jeremy A. Koss of Phillips, Eisinger, Koss & Rosenfeldt, P.A.,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frohman v. Bar-OrSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Ravel v. RavelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Kodner v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- Santana v. HenryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Grosso v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Mumma v. MummaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Santana v. HenryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009