Crofts & Anderson v. H. L. Petersen Construction Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
In June of 1953, Crofts and Anderson secured a judgment by stipulation against C. R. Petersen,1 and his firm, the H. L. Petersen Construction Company, in the amount of $2,816.41, plus costs. Subsequently, the sheriff, pursuant to a writ of execution, levied on three Arabian horses then in the possession of Petersen. Catherine Laguens, mother-in-law of Petersen, filed a third party claim to the horses, claiming to have purchased them from Petersen for $3,000 on December 5, 1952. At the termination of the hearing of the petition to determine title the trial court concluded that Catherine…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Southern California Collection Co. v. NapkieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Dean v. WalkenhorstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. StrobeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Edgerton v. ScammonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Hendricksen v. State Subsidiary, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1935
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cravens v. CoghlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Embree Uranium Co. v. LiebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Mann v. AndrusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959