Legal Opinion

Crofts & Anderson v. H. L. Petersen Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1955No. Civ. 16190PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

In June of 1953, Crofts and Anderson secured a judgment by stipulation against C. R. Petersen,1 and his firm, the H. L. Petersen Construction Company, in the amount of $2,816.41, plus costs. Subsequently, the sheriff, pursuant to a writ of execution, levied on three Arabian horses then in the possession of Petersen. Catherine Laguens, mother-in-law of Petersen, filed a third party claim to the horses, claiming to have purchased them from Petersen for $3,000 on December 5, 1952. At the termination of the hearing of the petition to determine title the trial court concluded that Catherine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Southern California Collection Co. v. NapkieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Dean v. WalkenhorstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Pacific States Savings & Loan Co. v. StrobeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Edgerton v. ScammonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. Hendricksen v. State Subsidiary, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cravens v. CoghlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Embree Uranium Co. v. LiebelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Mann v. AndrusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API