Legal Opinion

Stanfield v. Horn

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided January 9, 1989No. 3-88-0168Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

HIGGINS, District Judge.

On February 25, 1988, the plaintiff, Carmen R. Stanfield, a black female, filed this action against the defendants, Betty W. Horn, Administrator of the Board of Law Examiners of Tennessee; Charles W. Bur-son, President of the Board of Law Examiners of Tennessee; Lowry F. Kline, Vice-President of the Board of Law Examiners of Tennessee; and H. Lee Barfield, II, Secretary of the Board of Law Examiners of Tennessee, alleging that the defendants violated the Due Process and Equal Protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. John Doe v. E. E. PringleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  3. Razatos v. Colorado Supreme CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Arlene Nordgren v. Jerome HafterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  5. Stanfield v. HornDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API