Legal Opinion

Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. St. Joe Minerals Corp.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided June 23, 1995No. 3:94-cv-01076PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM, DECISION & ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

Defendants previously brought a motion to dismiss this action on several grounds. On December 23, 1994, the court heard arguments on the motion and rendered an oral decision in which it dismissed the complaint without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) because the case alleged was not currently a justiciable and ripe controversy upon which judgment could be rendered. This decision was summarized in an order dated February 25, 1995 after which judgment was entered by the Clerk of Court.

Plaintiffs now seek reconsideration of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Alcan Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. Atkins v. Marathon LeTourneau Co.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1990
  3. Durkin v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1977
  4. Larsen v. OrtegaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1992
  5. Bellefonte Reinsurance Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London v. St. Joe Minerals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. American Express Bank Ltd. v. Banco Español De Crédito, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Capital District Physician's Health Plan v. O'HigginsDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
  4. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. St. Joe Minerals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API