Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's v. St. Joe Minerals Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 26, 1996No. 1011, Docket 95-7729PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London and other companies subscribing to specified Lloyd’s insurance policies (the “London Market Insurers” or “plaintiffs”) appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (McA-voy, J.). The judgment dismissed plaintiffs’ declaratory judgment action against St. Joe Minerals Corporation, formerly known as St. Joseph Lead Company, and its successors in interest, Renco Group, Inc., D.R. Acquisition Corporation, and Doe Run Resources Corporation (collectively “St. Joe”). For the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's, London v. St. Joe Minerals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996