Legal Opinion

Sharav v. Scott

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 13, 1955PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

37 N.J. Super. 224 (1955)

117 A.2d 175

WILLIAM B. SHARAV, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

RUTH C. SCOTT, TRADING AS H. SCOTT EXCAVATING, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 27, 1955.

Decided October 13, 1955.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

Mr. Lawrence Friedman argued the cause for the defendant-appellant.

Mr. Stanley G. Bedford argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Messrs. Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, attorneys; Mr. Louis J. Pantages and Mr. Peter W. Mitchell, of counsel).

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

On…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Naidech v. HempflingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941
  2. Smith Richards Lumber Co., Inc. v. HurleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. ATC Systems, Inc. v. Valairco, Inc. (In Re Valairco, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
  2. Heljon Management Corp. v. Di LeoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  3. General Electric Co. v. E. Fred Sulzer and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Peters Well Drilling Co. v. HanzulaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API