Legal Opinion

Naidech v. Hempfling

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 19, 1941PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The action is under the Mechanics’ Lien Statute, N. J. S. A. 2:60-105 et seq. for materials furnished for a building. There was a motion to “strike out the complaint” as showing on its face that plaintiffs had received payment in full for all materials supplied after the “notice of intention” required by section 2:60-112 of the act had been filed; and the District Court judge “dismissed the action” as against the present respondents, charged in the complaint as “owners.”

The case is submitted on briefs; and the only question to be decided at…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lincoln Storage Warehouses v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
  2. Lincoln Storage Warehouses v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  3. General Electric Co. v. E. Fred Sulzer and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. General Electric Co. v. E. Fred Sulzer & Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  5. Sharav v. ScottNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API