Legal Opinion

People v. Billon

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 16, 1968No. Crim. 6894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalsman, J.

In this odd case, we reverse the judgment because there is no evidence to support an essential element of the offense charged. We decline to take judicial notice of the record of another case to fill gaps in the trial evidence on the ground that to do so would deny the defendant his right to trial by jury. We reject, however, defendant’s contention that the statute which serves as the foundation for the charge against him is unconstitutional.

The defendant Edward Billon was charged with: (1) assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245) 1 ; (2) burglary (§459) and (3) possession of a firearm…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flores v. ArroyoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. MorlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. People v. ClabornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re CastanedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. People v. BarreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API