Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 27, 1984No. 510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This is an appeal by appellant, Sears, Roebuck & Company, from an order of the trial court which denied appellant’s “PETITION TO OPEN DEFAULT JUDGMENT”. We must reverse and remand for the reasons herein stated.

The dispute in this case arose initially from a complaint in assumpsit and trespass which was filed on February 10, 1981, by appellee-plaintiff, Blanche Steinberg, against appellant-defendant, Sears, Roebuck & Company, and appelleedefendant, Duralite Company, Incorporated. According to appellee-plaintiff’s complaint, she “sat down in [a certain lawn or beach chair which…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. BALK v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Kraynick v. HERTZSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. McCoy v. Public Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Pappas v. StefanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Ruczynski v. Jesray Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolfskill v. EganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Alston v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Wolfskill v. EganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API