Legal Opinion

State v. Jim

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1995No. 18404, 18405PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Justice.

In these consolidated appeals, 1 Defendants-Appellants Harold Uhane Jim and Patrick L. Kahawaiola'a (Appellants) appeal from the district court’s judgment entered March 17, 1994, convicting them of the offense of criminal trespass in the second degree in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-814(l)(b) (1993). 2 For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

On October 9, 1993, the Appellants were arrested along with other persons for allegedly remaining on the premises of the Prince Kuhio Plaza after being requested to leave by an authorized agent of the Plaza.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ahuna v. Department of Hawaiian Home LandsHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Keaukaha-Panaewa Community Ass'n v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Aged Hawaiians v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionHawaii Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kepo'o v. KaneHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kepo'o v. WatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. JimHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. BEREDAYHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. State v. CANTIBEROSHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API