Legal Opinion
Marroquin v. Canales
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 8, 2007No. Civil CCB-05-3393PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CATHERINE C. BLAKE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jose Marroquin, on behalf of himself and a class of co-workers, and plaintiff Jose Sales claim damages in a collective action filed against their employers Unlimited Restoration, Inc. (“URI”), MFC General Contracting, Inc. (“MFC”), and Miguel Canales 1 , Fredis Canales, and Alicia Canales individually. The plaintiffs allege the defendants failed to pay them full wages for construction work in violation of the' Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 206-07, Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law; Md.Code Ann., Lab. & Empl. §§ 3-501-3-509…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ronald K. Drewitt v. Fred L. Pratt Pizza Hut of America, Inc., City of Norfolk, Party-In-InterestCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Serrano v. Chicken-Out Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Buckley v. AbuzirAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- Andrade Romero v. Rbs Construction Corporation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Clayton v. Delmarva Community Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
- Department Of Labor v. Sofia & Gicelle, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.