Knighton v. Desportes Merc. Co.

(concurring) : I think that there was no error in-the admission of testimony pr in the charge of the Circuit Judge, as assigned by the appellant, and that the judgment of the Circuit Court has attained the justice of this case and should be affirmed.

This is an action for $612.94, double the amount of usurious interest collected by the defendant from the plaintiff upon two notes executed and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant, the dates,- maturities, amounts, and rates of interest being as follows: (1) April 7, 1905, November 1, 1905, $274, 8 per cent, per annum. (2) March 19, 1907,…