Edwards v. Panda Express, Inc.

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 DAVID EDWARDS, Case No. 2:24-cv-001029-EJY 5 Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 PANDA EXPRESS, INC., a California corporation; DOES I-XX, inclusive; ROE 8 CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive 9 Defendants. 10 11 I. Introduction 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“MSJ”). ECF No. 13 16. In this very short MSJ there is neither a mention of the elements required to prove each cause 14 of action alleged, nor an application of law to any claim asserted. Id. In sum, Defendant argues that 15 because Plaintiff supposedly…