Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Town of Plainfield

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 17, 2000No. 98-560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs Alan Goldman and ABG Corporation appeal from the dismissal of their complaint upon defendant Town of Plainfield’s motion for summary judgment. On appeal, plaintiffs claim the trial court erred in (1) concluding as a matter of law that misrepresentations by the Town made in the course of contract negotiations were not material, and (2) in failing to properly apply the rational basis test to their claim of unjust discrimination. We affirm.

This Court reviews a motion for summary judgment using the same standard as the trial court. Summary judgment is appropriate only when the moving…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  2. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Knecht Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Union Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  5. DDD CORPORATION v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nashef v. AADCO Medical, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 2013
  2. Puro v. NEIL ENTERPRISES, INC.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Hogan Variance PermitVermont Superior Court · 2010
  4. State v. AgostaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
  5. Waitsfield Public Water System Act 250 PermitVermont Superior Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API