Legal Opinion

Hammer v. Gordon

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 18, 1934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Cueiam.

The action in this case was brought against the defendants, Harry Gordon and Silver Eod Stores, Incorporated, to recover damages for willfully and maliciously filling certain medical prescriptions with ingredients differing in kind from those set forth in the prescriptions. The judge, hearing the •case without a jury, found for the plantiff against both defendants, and the defendants appeal.

The specifications relied on for reversal are that there was error in the admission of testimony, in the denial of a motion for nonsuit, in the entry of judgment, and that the damages were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Middlesex & Somerset Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1903
  2. Schwartz v. EisnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelleher v. Detroit MotorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API