Schwartz v. Eisner
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Case, J.
The appeal is from a judgment entered in the Eirst District Court of the city of Newark upon a jury verdict.
The defendant has specified nine determinations wherein error is alleged. The first, second, third, fourth, eighth and ninth relate to alleged error said to have been committed during the course of the trial. The record shows no exceptions, and these matters are therefore not properly before us.
The fifth specification is that the trial court erroneously moulded the verdict. The record in that respect reads thus: “The jury’s verdict was:…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hammer v. GordonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934