Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Corrigan v. Voinovich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1975No. 75-32PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The initial question posed in this case is whether an original action in mandamus in this court is proper. Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and should be resorted to only where there is no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. Where, however, the public interest makes it necessary that an issue involving the expenditure and possible loss of large sums of public money be resolved without delay, an action in mandamus will be entertained by this court. The partially-completed construction of a large public facility makes the prompt resolution of the issue involved a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Riley Construction Co. v. East Liverpool City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. State, Ex Rel. Fontaine v. Hanover Bd, TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API