Pratt v. Topeka Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
■Error from Osage District Court. Foeeclosuee, brought by the Bank as plaintiff against Pratt and wife. At the November Term 1873, the plaintiff had judgment against Pratt for $3,065.18, and a decree against Pratt and wife for the sale of certain lands. The defendants bring the case here on error. The facts fully appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
*571The opinion of the court was delivered by
Brewer, J.:
Two grounds of error are alleged in the petition in error: first, that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the petition, and second, that the findings were not sustained by the evidence, and were contrary to law. Of course then, our inquiry, will be limited to these two matters. The question raised by the demurrer is this: The action was on a note and mortgage payable to the order of W. F. Aderhold. The petition alleges .that said Aderhold “indorsed, transferred, and delivered the said promissory note and mortgage to John R.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Bank of Genesee v. . the Patchin BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Carr v. CaldwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Dillon v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1855
- President of the Farmers & Mechanics' Bank v. President of the Troy City BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
- Robb v. Ross County BankNew York Supreme Court · 1864
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Foster Lumber Co. v. Harlan County BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Griffin v. ErskineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Greeno v. BarnardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Nave v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.